RFA (Radiofrequency Ablation) is Considered Safer and More Reliable than MWA (Microwave Ablation) in Gynecology

Radiofrequency Ablation System of Tumors-unique-medi trade

Why RFA (Radiofrequency Ablation) is Considered Safer and More Reliable than MWA (Microwave Ablation) in Gynecology

1. Clinically Proven, Globally Accepted, and Long-Term Evidence

  • RFA is an FDA-approved, globally accepted technique with extensive clinical validation.
  • It is recommended by multiple international gynecological societies and guidelines.
  • Long-term studies confirm RFA’s safety, efficacy, and durability in treating uterine fibroids.
  • In comparison, MWA is relatively new in gynecological applications, and lacks robust, long-term, large-scale global clinical evidence in fibroid management.

Contact for more details: +8801717834173

2. Safer and More Controlled Thermal Ablation

  • RFA offers precise and controlled ablation zones, with predictable tissue effects.
  • It significantly reduces the risk of damaging surrounding healthy uterine tissue, endometrium, or nearby organs.
  • MWA, due to its aggressive and rapid heating mechanism, creates larger thermal zones, increasing the risk of collateral tissue damage, especially in sensitive gynecological areas.

 

3. Ideal for Fertility-Preserving and Conservative Treatments

  • RFA is widely recognized for fertility-preserving fibroid treatments, ensuring minimal trauma to the uterus.
  • It allows accurate, layer-by-layer ablation, making it safer for reproductive-age women.
  • MWA’s high-power heating may compromise the endometrial lining or myometrium, especially in inexperienced hands.

 

4. Lower Risk of Complications

  • RFA’s thermal spread is narrow and well-contained, ensuring minimal post-procedure complications like adhesions, bleeding, or unintended necrosis.
  • MWA’s larger, uncontrolled heat spread may cause more post-ablation discomfort, cramping, or adjacent organ irritation.

 

5. More Cost-Effective and Widely Available

  • RFA systems are more widely available, cost-effective, and user-friendly in gynecology practices.
  • MWA equipment is more expensive, requires specialized skills, and is not yet universally available for gynecological use.

✅ Summary:

While both RFA and MWA are effective for fibroid ablation, RFA remains the safer, more precise, and globally recommended method in gynecology, particularly for patients requiring:

  • Uterus preservation
  • Fertility consideration
  • Low-risk, controlled, and evidence-based treatment

MWA may be used in selected cases, but RFA remains the gold standard and trusted choice for most gynecologists.

Contact for more details: +8801717834173